Dear Geoff, my question is about the theoretical approaches to double-oblique alignment raised by Faruk Akkuş (2019), Baker, Atlamaz (2014) and Gündoğdu (2011). They try to describe Muş Kurdish alignment patterns with either Standard Case Theory or with a modified version of Dependent Case Theory (Marantz 1991). What is your opinion on the best way to account for an oblique case being realized both ob the A participant and P participant in past tenses?